Monitor vulnerabilities like this one. Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
9.6

CVE-2026-53513: Outdated @better-auth/sso Plugin Allows Unauthorized Server Access

GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v CVE-2026-53513 CVE-2026-53513
Summary

If you're using an outdated version of the @better-auth/sso plugin, an attacker can access your server by tricking your system into making unauthorized requests. This can happen even if the attacker doesn't have a valid account on your system. To fix this, you need to upgrade the plugin to the latest version or follow the provided workarounds if an upgrade is not possible.

What to do
  • Update better-auth sso to version 1.6.11.
Affected software
Ecosystem VendorProductAffected versions
npm better-auth sso >= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11
Fix: upgrade to 1.6.11
better-auth better-auth >= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11
@better-auth sso >= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11
Original title
@better-auth/sso provider registration has server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints
Original description
### Am I affected?

Users are affected if all of the following are true:

- Their application uses `@better-auth/sso` at a version `>= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11` on the stable line, or any `1.7.0-beta.x` on the pre-release line.
- The `sso()` plugin is added to their application's `betterAuth({ plugins: [...] })` array.
- Any user with a valid Better Auth session can reach `POST /sso/register` (the plugin's default gate accepts any session).

For the non-blind SSRF impact (full IAM credential or internal HTTP body exfiltration), no further configuration is required.

For the account takeover escalation, additionally:

- Developers set `sso({ trustEmailVerified: true, ... })`.
- The developer's application deployment has accounts whose `email` overlaps with attacker-chosen domains.

If developers do not enable the SSO plugin, their application is not affected.

Fix:

1. Upgrade to `@better-auth/[email protected]` or later.
2. If developers cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.

### Summary

The `@better-auth/sso` plugin's `POST /sso/register` endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, and `jwksEndpoint` URLs when `skipDiscovery: true` is set, persists them on the `ssoProvider` row without origin validation, then issues server-side fetches to those URLs during the OIDC callback. The fetched response body is reflected through the user profile, producing a non-blind SSRF reachable by any authenticated session. The same primitive exists on `POST /sso/update-provider`.

### Details

The schema field types accept bare strings: no `.url()` validator, no origin gate. The discovery branch (`skipDiscovery: false`) routes URLs through `validateDiscoveryUrl`; the skip-discovery branch persists them as-is. At callback time three fetch sites read the stored URLs: `validateAuthorizationCode` for the token endpoint, `betterFetch` for the userInfo endpoint, and `validateToken` for the JWKS endpoint.

When `trustEmailVerified: true` is configured, the attacker can escalate to account linking. A malicious userInfo response with `emailVerified: true` and a chosen `email` triggers OAuth auto-link against any pre-existing user row with that email, compounding the SSRF into account takeover.

### Patches

Fixed in `@better-auth/[email protected]`. Provider registration (`POST /sso/register` with `skipDiscovery: true`) and every `POST /sso/update-provider` request now validate each supplied OIDC endpoint URL (`authorizationEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, `userInfoEndpoint`, `jwksEndpoint`, `discoveryEndpoint`) at registration time. A URL is rejected unless it satisfies one of two conditions:

1. Its host is publicly routable on the internet, evaluated through the `@better-auth/core/utils/host.isPublicRoutableHost` gate. RFC 1918 private ranges, RFC 4193 unique-local addresses, link-local addresses (including the cloud-metadata IP `169.254.169.254`), loopback, multicast, broadcast, and reserved ranges are rejected, along with cloud-metadata FQDNs.
2. Its origin is already listed in the application's `trustedOrigins` configuration. This preserves the documented escape hatch for customers running internal IdPs intentionally on private networks.

The schema also tightens from `z.string()` to `z.url()` on those fields, so malformed URLs fail at parse time rather than at fetch time. Deployments running internal IdPs that previously worked must add the IdP's origin to `trustedOrigins` to keep working after upgrade.

### Workarounds

If developers cannot upgrade immediately:

- **Disable provider self-registration**: set `sso({ providersLimit: 0 })`. The limit is enforced before the schema branch, blocking every `/sso/register` regardless of `skipDiscovery`.
- **Reverse-proxy gate**: block `POST /sso/register` and `POST /sso/update-provider` at the edge, or restrict to a denylist of source IPs and a small admin user list.
- **Network-level egress controls**: block egress from the auth server to RFC 1918, RFC 4193, link-local ranges (`169.254.0.0/16`, `fe80::/10`), and the cloud-metadata FQDN list at the firewall or VPC level. AWS users should additionally enforce IMDSv2 (`HttpTokens: required`).
- **Set `trustEmailVerified: false`** until upgrade. This caps the impact at non-blind SSRF and removes the account-takeover escalation, but does not stop the SSRF.

### Impact

- **Server-Side Request Forgery (non-blind)**: the attacker reads response bodies from any HTTP endpoint reachable from the auth server, including cloud metadata services (AWS IMDS, GCP metadata FQDN), internal-only APIs, and infrastructure services such as Redis or admin panels bound to localhost.
- **Account takeover** (when `trustEmailVerified: true`): the attacker mints a malicious userInfo response asserting `emailVerified: true` for an arbitrary email, triggering OAuth auto-link against pre-existing user rows.

### Credit

Reported by Vaadata.

### Resources

- [CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html)
- [CWE-20: Improper Input Validation](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html)
- [CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/441.html)
- [CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/345.html)
ghsa CVSS3.1 9.6
Vulnerability type
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
CWE-345
CWE-441
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Published: 7 Jul 2026 · Updated: 20 Jul 2026 · First seen: 7 Jul 2026