Monitor vulnerabilities like this one. Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
9.4

FlowiseAI: DatasetRow data can be stolen from other workspaces

GHSA-7j65-65cr-6644
Summary

A bug in FlowiseAI's DatasetRow feature allows an attacker to access and modify data from other workspaces. This could happen if a user with access to one workspace is tricked into updating a DatasetRow with malicious data. To fix this, FlowiseAI developers should review and update their code to prevent unauthorized access and data modification.

What to do
  • Update henryheng flowise to version 3.1.2.
  • Update flowise to version 3.1.2.
Affected software
Ecosystem VendorProductAffected versions
npm henryheng flowise <= 3.1.1
< 3.1.2
Fix: upgrade to 3.1.2
npm – flowise <= 3.1.1
Fix: upgrade to 3.1.2
Original title
FlowiseAI: DatasetRow create+update mass-assignment allows cross-workspace row takeover
Original description
## Summary

**Type:** Mass assignment via `Object.assign(entity, body)` -> client-controlled `workspaceId` (and on create, `id`) overwritten on the DatasetRow entity -> cross-workspace data takeover and IDOR.
**File:** `packages/server/src/services/dataset/index.ts`
**Root cause:** The DatasetRow controller/service constructs a `new DatasetRow()` and copies the request body into it via `Object.assign(...)` without an explicit field allowlist. The request body therefore can include `workspaceId`, `id`, `createdDate`, `updatedDate`. The server only rebinds *some* of these after the assign (e.g. on create, it overwrites `workspaceId` but not `id`; on update, it overwrites `id` but not `workspaceId`). The remaining client-controlled values land directly on the persisted row, breaking workspace isolation. Same root pattern as the datasetrow entity's sibling controllers and as `DocumentStore` before it was patched in commit 840d2ae.

## Affected Code

**File:** `packages/server/src/services/dataset/index.ts`

```ts
// create (line 274) and update (line 315)
Object.assign(newRow, rowBody) // <-- BUG: rowBody.id, rowBody.datasetId accepted
```

**Why it's wrong:** `Object.assign(target, source)` copies every own enumerable property of `source` onto `target`. The TypeORM/SQL persistence layer below it does not strip ownership-bearing columns, so `workspaceId` set in the request body lands as the new `workspaceId` of the persisted row. The DocumentStore patch (commit 840d2ae) demonstrated the intended fix shape (explicit field-by-field allowlist) but it has not been applied to this entity.

## Exploit Chain

1. Attacker is an authenticated member of workspace A. They have a session cookie / JWT for the Flowise web UI. State at this point: attacker can read and write entities scoped to workspace A.
2. Attacker creates a datasetrow in workspace A via the documented API (or reuses an existing one they own). They note its entity `id`.
3. Attacker issues a `PUT /api/v1/datasetrows/<id>` (or equivalent endpoint) with a JSON body that includes `"workspaceId": "<workspace-B-id>"` (an arbitrary other workspace's UUID). State at this point: the request reaches the controller as a workspace-A authenticated request.
4. The controller calls `Object.assign(updateEntity, body)`. The body's `workspaceId` overwrites the entity's `workspaceId` field. The persistence layer commits the row.
5. Final state: the datasetrow row is now owned by workspace B. Workspace B members can see it, modify it, and use it. Workspace A loses access (it no longer satisfies their workspace filter). The original creator's workspace audit shows nothing because the operation looked like a normal update.

## Security Impact

**Severity:** High. Cross-workspace boundary violation by any authenticated workspace member.
**Attacker capability:** Any authenticated user with permission to update a datasetrow can move it to any workspace whose UUID they can guess or enumerate (workspace UUIDs are exposed in many API responses, so enumeration is trivial). DatasetRows hold individual training/evaluation records. The mass assignment lets a member rebind a row to a Dataset in another workspace via `datasetId`, exposing the row content to the destination workspace.
**Preconditions:** Authenticated session with edit permission for the source datasetrow. No second factor required. Workspace UUIDs are exposed via the `/api/v1/workspaces` listing or via any cross-referenced object's `workspaceId` field, so target enumeration is trivial.
**Differential:** PoC-verified by source inspection of the original GHSA-q4pr-4r26-c69r. Patched build (with the suggested fix below) refuses the `workspaceId` field; vulnerable build accepts it and persists it.

## Suggested Fix

Already fixed in PR https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/6051 (allowlist pattern applied).

```ts
// Allowlist pattern (matches commit 840d2ae for DocumentStore):
const updatedDatasetRow = new DatasetRow()
if (body.<allowed_field_1> !== undefined) updatedDatasetRow.<allowed_field_1> = body.<allowed_field_1>
if (body.<allowed_field_2> !== undefined) updatedDatasetRow.<allowed_field_2> = body.<allowed_field_2>
// ...whitelist only the documented fields. Never copy id, workspaceId, createdDate, updatedDate from the client.
```

Regression tests should assert that a request body containing `workspaceId`, `id`, `createdDate`, or `updatedDate` is rejected (or at minimum: does not change those columns on the persisted row) for both create and update paths.
ghsa CVSS4.0 7.7
Vulnerability type
CWE-915
Published: 14 May 2026 · Updated: 29 May 2026 · First seen: 14 May 2026