Monitor vulnerabilities like this one.
Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
4.5
JRuby Bcrypt Hashes Weakened by Integer Overflow
GHSA-f27w-vcwj-c954
CVE-2026-33306
GHSA-f27w-vcwj-c954
Summary
A bug in the JRuby bcrypt implementation can make password hashes much weaker when using the cost setting of 31, allowing attackers to easily guess passwords. Affected applications should update to the latest bcrypt-ruby version (3.1.22) or use a lower cost setting to fix this issue.
What to do
- Update coda hale bcrypt to version 3.1.22.
- Update bcrypt to version 3.1.22.
Affected software
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|
| coda hale | bcrypt | <= 3.1.21 | 3.1.22 |
| coda hale | bcrypt | <= 3.1.22 | 3.1.22 |
| – | bcrypt | <= 3.1.21 | 3.1.22 |
Original title
bcrypt-ruby is a Ruby binding for the OpenBSD bcrypt() password hashing algorithm. Prior to version 3.1.22, an integer overflow in the Java BCrypt implementation for JRuby can cause zero iterations...
Original description
bcrypt-ruby is a Ruby binding for the OpenBSD bcrypt() password hashing algorithm. Prior to version 3.1.22, an integer overflow in the Java BCrypt implementation for JRuby can cause zero iterations in the strengthening loop. Impacted applications must be setting the cost to 31 to see this happen. The JRuby implementation of bcrypt-ruby (`BCrypt.java`) computes the key-strengthening round count as a signed 32-bit integer. When `cost=31` (the maximum allowed by the gem), signed integer overflow causes the round count to become negative, and the strengthening loop executes **zero iterations**. This collapses bcrypt from 2^31 rounds of exponential key-strengthening to effectively constant-time computation — only the initial EksBlowfish key setup and final 64x encryption phase remain. The resulting hash looks valid (`$2a$31$...`) and verifies correctly via `checkpw`, making the weakness invisible to the application. This issue is triggered only when cost=31 is used or when verifying a `$2a$31$` hash. This problem has been fixed in version 3.1.22. As a workaround, set the cost to something less than 31.
ghsa CVSS4.0
4.5
Vulnerability type
CWE-190
Integer Overflow
- https://github.com/bcrypt-ruby/bcrypt-ruby/commit/831ce64cb0a9502130fa93a28bfd95...
- https://github.com/bcrypt-ruby/bcrypt-ruby/releases/tag/v3.1.22
- https://github.com/bcrypt-ruby/bcrypt-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-f27w-vcwj-c9...
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-f27w-vcwj-c954
- https://github.com/bcrypt-ruby/bcrypt-ruby Product
Published: 24 Mar 2026 · Updated: 24 Mar 2026 · First seen: 19 Mar 2026